It is interesting to see what some people in political power call representation. I have lately been witnessing some examples of politicians doing what they deem as right or in the best interests of citizens yet not come out among us in any two-way conversation. It has become a patriarchal scenario with a barrier between those who have been elected and those who elected them. Of course if you have lots of money you can pay to see a representative at their numerous political fundraisers. There just seems to be a disconnect between those who are voted in to lead us and their ability to connect with us. It is why I call into question the meaning of representation. Honesty derives a sense of empowerment that allows the honest one to hold their head up and look people in the eye when conversing. It is a way for us to see the conviction of our leaders through their contenance, in conjunction with hearing their verbal vision, that helps us understand the problems we face. All we seem to get now are one-minute soundbites that are recorded or given in a forum that does not allow for public interchange. Thus the disconnect I was referencing. My problem with this current paradigm with political messaging and the alternative of actually living in and amongst the constituency is that the former is abundant and the latter is non-existent. With the disconnect as the dominant reality we lose our identities to an illusion. When those who are voted in to represent us are living in a world that is not of our current dilemmas, then a loss of identifying with the constituency occurs. The courage it takes to be a leader is never to be taken lightly, conversely, the honor of walking in courage reflecting the values and struggles of a constituency is a necessary requirement needed to be an effective representative.
No comments:
Post a Comment