(#6433) 52 days until the election...still nothing from the supreme court on mail in ballots

     We are another day closer to our elections and all seems to have calmed down. With both the district judge and appeals court keeping things as they are the supreme court seems in no hurry to do anything to change the status quo. Which for we the people that is welcome. We know our elections work properly and the insinuation from only the trump camp that it doesn't hasn't been logical. It is trump's word that there is mass cheating and no other proof has been presented. He bases his claim off the results he doesn't like not actual proof. So far the courts still operate under the truth of things not the desires of trump outside of logic!
     North Carolina and Delaware are already sending out overseas mail ballots, in 2 days, on this coming Tuesday Pennsylvania will begin early voting. 5 days later Minnesota and South Dakota begin theirs and then the very next day, Vermont and Virginia start their early voting. If the trump postal rule was going to be initiated by the supreme court they have had 3 days since the appellate court affirmed the temporary injunction of the federal judge to stop the postal rule from moving forward, to make a ruling But the supreme court has been silent so far. With the elections underway what else are we to determine about the fate of the postal rule if not that it will remain overruled since time is an imperative?
     Right now is the best time of the season for elections. When anticipations are high and emotions are strong. It makes absolutely no sense to change the rules during an actual election and that seems to be the case with the postal rule fate. Free and unencumbered voting is what our Constitution demands and that appears to be what we will get. The will of the people is the foundation of our democracy and voting with the one person one vote ideal we will still have it. There has been no final word from the supreme court yet but as each minute passes into hours and days the only outcome they could summarize at this juncture for this disruptive postal rule is that it doesn't pass constitutional muster by affirming the federal judge and appellate court decision.