Too many times I see from our democrats the need to solve all our problems at once. If not that then many of them linked for solving regardless of the impossibility to get it done. My advice will be to solve those problems we can solve now, now! I don't mind that there are many problems that need solving I mind that we get bogged down trying do too much all at once instead of taking each step we can to solve a problem. Eventually we get there if we keep our focus on accomplishing what can be solved. If we fix one problem then we can focus all our energy on the next problem. Always prioritizing where we can as much as possible.
Some problems will take years to solve just because of the enormity of the challenge of change. All the minutiae and nuance that has to be adjusted is not something that can just be waved into existence. For every problem we have there are myriad reasons for them. So it seems logical to take one problem at a time and put all our might into making the solution the best and most efficient so that it can last over time because it has been vetted to the core. When we try to link problems with a final solution we often find that we have not answered all the questions about how best to make these solutions work. I don't want to have a pile of problems solved together only to find that by doing so we have only changed the problem from one problem into another problem.
By resolving to focus on just one problem we can pick that problem apart and then see all the inner workings of it so that when we do find the change that best fits solving the problem there won't be any ambiguity or confusion. Always after the most exhaustive investigation into how and why the problem persists are we able to scrutinize a solution for its best fit. Trying to do that on a multi problem level only makes the event of solution exponentially more difficult with a greater chance of getting it wrong. I am arguing here for a single solution for a single problem. Then moving on to the next problem. We are an amazing species but as time has shown recently we are not all that amazing when we set out to change what needs to be changed or stop that which needs never to have been.
Some problems will take years to solve just because of the enormity of the challenge of change. All the minutiae and nuance that has to be adjusted is not something that can just be waved into existence. For every problem we have there are myriad reasons for them. So it seems logical to take one problem at a time and put all our might into making the solution the best and most efficient so that it can last over time because it has been vetted to the core. When we try to link problems with a final solution we often find that we have not answered all the questions about how best to make these solutions work. I don't want to have a pile of problems solved together only to find that by doing so we have only changed the problem from one problem into another problem.
By resolving to focus on just one problem we can pick that problem apart and then see all the inner workings of it so that when we do find the change that best fits solving the problem there won't be any ambiguity or confusion. Always after the most exhaustive investigation into how and why the problem persists are we able to scrutinize a solution for its best fit. Trying to do that on a multi problem level only makes the event of solution exponentially more difficult with a greater chance of getting it wrong. I am arguing here for a single solution for a single problem. Then moving on to the next problem. We are an amazing species but as time has shown recently we are not all that amazing when we set out to change what needs to be changed or stop that which needs never to have been.
No comments:
Post a Comment